Bajaj Pulsar Comparison: NS200 vs. NS400Z – Pioneer or New Heir?

Bajaj Pulsar Comparison: NS200 vs. NS400Z – Pioneer or New Heir?

June 1, 2024 0 By The Editor

Bajaj Pulsar Comparison: Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2012) vs. Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z (2024)

Here’s a comprehensive breakdown dissecting the key differences between the 2012 Pulsar NS200 and the brand new 2024 Pulsar NS400Z:

Bajaj Pulsar Comparison – Engine & Performance:

The heart of the machine is where the biggest difference lies. The NS200 (2012) packs a 199.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that produces a decent 23.5 PS of power and 18.3 Nm of torque. Mated to a 5-speed gearbox, it’s a well-proven setup known for offering a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.

However, the NS400Z (2024) is a beast in comparison. Featuring a much larger 394.34cc, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine, it churns out a significant 40 PS of power and 35 Nm of torque. This translates to a more thrilling ride with exciting acceleration and the ability to handle highways with ease. The 6-speed gearbox should offer smoother gear changes and a wider cruising range.


Bajaj Pulsar Comparison – Price at launch:

Price is a crucial factor for many buyers. The NS200 (2012) was launched at a much more affordable price point of approximately ₹85,000 (ex-showroom), making it an attractive option for budget-conscious riders.

The NS400Z (2024), being a bigger and more powerful motorcycle with modern features, is expected to have a launch price around ₹1,85,000 (ex-showroom). This positions it in a more premium segment.


Bajaj Pulsar Comparison – Design:

Both motorcycles boast a muscular streetfighter design philosophy. The NS200 (2012) has a timeless appeal with a sculpted fuel tank, sharp lines, and a semi-fairing that provides some wind protection. It was initially offered in four color options, including sporty red and black combinations.

The NS400Z (2024) takes a leap forward with a sharper and more contemporary design language. The sculpted fuel tank is expected to be more aerodynamic, and the LED projector headlamp adds a touch of sophistication. The split seat setup should enhance comfort for both rider and pillion. Similar to the NS200, it’s likely to be offered in four color options at launch, catering to diverse tastes.


Bajaj Pulsar Comparison – Handling:

Nimble handling is a key characteristic of Pulsars. The NS200 (2012), thanks to its lightweight construction (around 154 kg) and a perimeter frame, offers exceptional agility. This makes it perfect for navigating city traffic and maneuvering through tight spaces.

The NS400Z (2024), with a slightly heavier weight (around 174 kg) due to its larger engine, might not be quite as flickable as the NS200. However, the extra weight could translate to better stability at higher speeds, especially on highways.


Bajaj Pulsar Comparison  – Technology:

Technology has evolved significantly in the past decade. The NS200 (2012) comes equipped with a basic instrument cluster featuring an analog speedometer and tachometer. It lacks any advanced features like digital displays or connectivity options.

The NS400Z (2024) is expected to take a giant leap forward in technology. It’s likely to boast a fully-digital instrument cluster displaying a range of information, Bluetooth connectivity for navigation, call display, and potentially other rider-centric features like ride modes that alter engine performance for different riding conditions.


Bajaj Pulsar Comparison – Other Aspects to Consider:

  • Mileage: Due to its smaller engine, the NS200 (2012) is expected to deliver better fuel efficiency, likely around 36 kmpl compared to the NS400Z’s estimated 28 kmpl.

Bajaj Pulsar Comparison Features

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2012)

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z (2024)

Price Budget-friendly Likely more expensive
Fuel Efficiency More fuel-efficient Slightly less fuel-efficient
Maintenance Costs Lower maintenance costs Similar maintenance costs
Weight Lighter weight for easier handling Might be slightly heavier but potentially more stable at high speeds
City Riding Excellent for city commutes May also be good for city riding, test ride to confirm
Highway Riding Might struggle on highways due to lower power More powerful engine for comfortable highway cruising
Design Classic streetfighter design Modern and aggressive design
Technology Basic technology Expected to have advanced features
Power & Performance Good balance of power and fuel efficiency Offers significantly more power and performance
Resale Value Good resale value Expected to have good resale value due to its positioning



2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS 400Z review: The Conclusion

Finally we conclude the 3rd chapter of our 4 part series, no this is not the end not just yet. Riding the Pulsar NS for 98,495 kilometers and 5 laps doesn’t justify the time spent on the Pulsar NS 400Z. It is a relationship that only grows stronger with time (read kilometres). In case you missed the earlier series, click on the links below to get up to speed, till then “Turn N Burn”

visit PickMySite src=